Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 054403 (2007)Vlasov solver for longitudinal dynamics in beam delivery systems for x-ray free electron lasersMarco Venturini, Robert Warnock, and Alexander Zholents |
PRL Celebrates 50 Years
This Week's Milestone Letters are from 1985: |
(Some reference links may require a separate subscription.)
- E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 483, 516 (2002) [CAS].
- S. Heifets, G. Stupakov, and S. Krinsky, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 064401 (2002) [SPIRES].
- Z. Huang and K.-J. Kim, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 074401 (2002) [SPIRES].
- Z. Huang, M. Borland, P. Emma, J. Wu, C. Limborg, G. Stupakov, and J. Welch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 074401 (2004) [SPIRES].
- C. Bohn, in Advanced Accelerator Concepts: Tenth Workshop, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 647 (AIP, New York, 2002), pp. 81–95.
- C. Z. Cheng and G. Knorr, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 330 (1976) [INSPEC][ADS].
- O. Boine-Frankenheim, I. Hofmann, and G. Rumolo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3256 (1999).
- E. Sonnendrücker, J. Roche, P. Bertrand, and A. Ghizzo, J. Comput. Phys. 149, 201 (1999).
- R. Warnock and J. Ellison, in Proceedings of the 2nd ICFA Advanced Workshop on Physics of High Brightness Beams, Los Angeles, 1999 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000); also available as SLAC-PUB-8404, 2000.
- M. Venturini and R. Warnock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 224802 (2002) [CAS][SPIRES].
- M. Venturini, R. Warnock, R. Ruth, and J. A. Ellison, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 014202 (2005) [SPIRES].
- R. Warnock, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 561, 186 (2006) [CrossRef][CAS].
- R. Warnock, G. Bassi, and J. Ellison, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 85 (2006) [CrossRef][CAS].
- A. Sobol, Ph.D. dissertation, Mathematics, University of New Mexico, 2006.
- N. Crouseilles, G. Latu, and E. Sonnendrücker, Research report INRIA Lorraine 5926 (http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00078455).
- M. Gutnic, G. Latu, and E. Sonnendrücker, in Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion, Saint Malo, France [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A (to be published)].
- M. Gutnic, M. Haefele, and E. Sonnendrücker, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 159 (2006) [CrossRef][CAS]; M. Mehrenberger, E. Violard, O. Hoenen, M. Campos Pinto, and E. Sonnendrücker,, 188 (2006) [CrossRef][CAS].
- J. Behrens and A. Iske, Comput. Math. Appl. 43, 319 (2002).
- Throughout this paper p will always denote an energy, not a momentum.
- R. Warnock, R. Ruth, M. Venturini, and J. A. Ellison, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 014402 (2005) [SPIRES].
- R. Warnock and M. Venturini, Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, 2003 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2003), p. 3144.
- A. Chao, Physics of Collective Beam Instabilities in High Energy Acceleratos (Wiley, New York, 1993).
- We use a -^ to remind ourselves that Z-^ is an impedance per unit length.
- R. Ruth, in Nonlinear Dynamics Aspects of Beam Dynamcis, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).
- This algorithm specifically applies to bunch compressors; in an accelerating structure advancement of the beam density is much simpler as we only need to apply energy kicks and items (i) through (iv) can be skipped.
- C. Bocchetta et al., Proceedings of the FEL Conference 2006, Berlin, Germany (unpublished).
- Here ρi and ρf refer to the beam density in the absence of the sinusoidal modulation.
- After completion of this work, we came to the realization that for Gaussian beams this choice may lead to overestimating the space-charge impedance while the expression suggested in Appendix A of [4] rb=1.7(σx+σy)/2 appears to be a better fit. We will address this point more at length in a forthcoming paper.
- K. Bane, Proceedings of the 1991 Particle Accelerator Conference (1991), p. 1800.
- J. Rosenzweig, C. Pellegrini, L. Serafini, C. Ternieden, and G. Travish, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 393, 376 (1997) [CrossRef][CAS].


