Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 089002 (2005) [2 pages]Reply to “Comment on ‘Quasiperiodic spin-orbit motion and spin tunes in storage rings’ ”
We reply to Lee and Mane’s foregoing Comment [ Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8 089001 (2005)]. In particular, we discuss how an adherence to certain notions of spin-orbit resonance and spin tune can limit the analysis and understanding of phenomena. Since the Comment has very little to do with the main thrust of our paper we take the opportunity to point out the main features of the “proper uniform precession rate,” a concept introduced in our paper and based on the concept of quasiperiodicity. We also respond to other material in the Comment. This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. © 2005 The American Physical Society URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.089002
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.089002
PACS:
29.27.Hj, 29.20.Dh, 02.60.Lj, 02.30.Nw
See AlsoOriginal Article: D. P. Barber, J. A. Ellison, and K. Heinemann, Quasiperiodic spin-orbit motion and spin tunes in storage rings, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 124002 (2004). |
|
About | Terms and Conditions | Subscriptions | Search | Help
Use of the American Physical Society websites and journals implies that the user has read and agrees to our Terms and Conditions and any applicable Subscription Agreement. Physical Review®, Physical Review Letters®, Reviews of Modern Physics®, and Physical Review Special Topics® are trademarks of the American Physical Society.