Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 119202 (2004) [2 pages]Reply to “Comment on ‘Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch'”
The authors disagree with Dr. D. V. Pestrikov’s assertion that “the results obtained in the commented paper are not true,” based on how Volterra’s integral equations are treated in the paper. The authors would agree, for clarity, that the equal sign (=) in Eqs. (34), (36), and (38) in the paper be replaced by some special symbol or the approximate sign (≈) to indicate the omission of initial conditions. These and similar changes together with the revision to an error found by the authors have been published in a recent erratum. This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. © 2004 The American Physical Society URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.119202
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.119202
PACS:
29.27.Bd, 41.75.–i, 52.40.Mj, 52.35.Qz
See AlsoOriginal Article: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 014204 (2003). |
|
About | Terms and Conditions | Subscriptions | Search | Help
Use of the American Physical Society websites and journals implies that the user has read and agrees to our Terms and Conditions and any applicable Subscription Agreement. Physical Review®, Physical Review Letters®, Reviews of Modern Physics®, and Physical Review Special Topics® are trademarks of the American Physical Society.