Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 119202 (2004) [2 pages]Reply to “Comment on ‘Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch'”
Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, and Robert J. Macek
Ronald C. Davidson Received 23 July 2004; published 23 November 2004 The authors disagree with Dr. D. V. Pestrikov’s assertion that “the results obtained in the commented paper are not true,” based on how Volterra’s integral equations are treated in the paper. The authors would agree, for clarity, that the equal sign (=) in Eqs. (34), (36), and (38) in the paper be replaced by some special symbol or the approximate sign (≈) to indicate the omission of initial conditions. These and similar changes together with the revision to an error found by the authors have been published in a recent erratum. ©2004 The American Physical Society
URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.119202 See AlsoOriginal: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 014204 (2003) Erratum: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Erratum: Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch [Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 014204 (2003)], Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 069901 (2004) Comment: D. V. Pestrikov, Comment on “Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch”, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 119201 (2004) [ Abstract | Previous article | Next article | Issue 11 ] |
A new free weekly publication from APS
Read the latest from Physics:
Viewpoint: Power laws in chess |


