Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 119201 (2004) [2 pages]Comment on “Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch”
D. V. Pestrikov * Received 5 February 2004; published 23 November 2004 We show that, due to inaccurate calculations with a Volterra integral equation, the results obtained in the commented paper are not true. Such an awkwardness could be avoided if the authors would retain in their calculations initial conditions for the proton bunch centroid. ©2004 The American Physical Society
URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.119201 * Electronic address: pestrikov@inp.nsk.su See AlsoOriginal: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 014204 (2003) Erratum: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Erratum: Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch [Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 014204 (2003)], Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 069901 (2004) Reply: Tai-Sen F. Wang, Paul J. Channell, Robert J. Macek, and Ronald C. Davidson, Reply to “Comment on ‘Centroid theory of transverse electron-proton two-stream instability in a long proton bunch'”, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 119202 (2004) [ Abstract | Previous article | Next article | Issue 11 ] |
A new free weekly publication from APS 
Read the latest from Physics:
Viewpoint: Power laws in chess |
APS | Journals | Contact Information | Phys. Rev. ST - Accel. Beams | Join APS | Feedback
ISSN 1098-4402 © 2009 by The American Physical Society All rights reserved. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams™ is a trademark of The American Physical Society. Use of APS online journals implies that the user has read and agrees to the Terms and Conditions in the Subscription Agreement .